<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brendon Davis &#187; VISTA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brendon.davis.to/category/techstuff/vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brendon.davis.to</link>
	<description>The place where I'm in charge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 05:20:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>RDP to MCE without effecting TV</title>
		<link>http://brendon.davis.to/2010/03/31/rdp-to-mce-without-effecting-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://brendon.davis.to/2010/03/31/rdp-to-mce-without-effecting-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 03:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brendon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechStuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VISTA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brendon.davis.to/?p=627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One limitation of my setup at home is that all television channels go through the Media Center so when I need to do maintenance I have to interrupt my wife&#8217;s programs. While not officially supported by Microsoft, there is an excellent modification that The Missing Remote has published. A simple batch file installs a different DLL for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One limitation of my setup at home is that all television channels go through the Media Center so when I need to do maintenance I have to interrupt my wife&#8217;s programs.</p>
<p>While not officially supported by Microsoft, there is an excellent modification that <a href="http://www.missingremote.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=3692&amp;Itemid=232">The Missing Remote</a> has published. A simple batch file installs a different DLL for Terminal services that allows the console to remain logged on while up to 2 other users log into a separate RDP session.</p>
<p>Now I can do any management and monitoring or changes necessary without having to submit a &#8220;TV-Outage Request&#8221;. :-D Very cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brendon.davis.to/2010/03/31/rdp-to-mce-without-effecting-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Group Policy Center</title>
		<link>http://brendon.davis.to/2010/01/21/group-policy-center/</link>
		<comments>http://brendon.davis.to/2010/01/21/group-policy-center/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brendon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechStuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VISTA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brendon.davis.to/?p=569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alan Burchill, one of the organisers for the Brisbane Infrastructure Group and a speaker at last year&#8217;s auTechEd has started up a web site for the thing he loves most. The Group Policy Center is now online and answering all those questions you didn&#8217;t know you asked. On a serious note though, Alan and Lilia did an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-571" title="Group Policy" src="http://brendon.davis.to/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Group-Policy.png" border="0" alt="" height="80" />Alan Burchill, one of the organisers for the Brisbane Infrastructure Group and a speaker at last year&#8217;s auTechEd has started up a web site for the thing he loves most. The <a href="http://www.grouppolicy.biz/">Group Policy Center</a> is now online and answering all those questions you didn&#8217;t know you asked.</p>
<p>On a serious note though, Alan and Lilia did an awesome presentation at TechEd and I&#8217;m sure this site will show the same level of awesome-ness. Rock on Al.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brendon.davis.to/2010/01/21/group-policy-center/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BitLocker Command Line</title>
		<link>http://brendon.davis.to/2009/02/04/bitlocker-command-line/</link>
		<comments>http://brendon.davis.to/2009/02/04/bitlocker-command-line/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brendon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TechStuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VISTA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brendon.davis.to/?p=318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now I know this is posted in several other locations. Since I have started playing around with BitLocker, I cannot for the life of me remember the command line. So here it is: C:\WINDOWS\System32\cscript manage-bde.wsf -help Enjoy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I know this is posted in several other locations. Since I have started playing around with BitLocker, I cannot for the life of me remember the command line. So here it is:</p>
<p>C:\WINDOWS\System32\cscript manage-bde.wsf -help</p>
<p>Enjoy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brendon.davis.to/2009/02/04/bitlocker-command-line/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good VISTA TechNet article</title>
		<link>http://brendon.davis.to/2007/03/09/good-vista-technet-article/</link>
		<comments>http://brendon.davis.to/2007/03/09/good-vista-technet-article/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 07:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brendon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TechStuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VISTA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brendon.davis.to/2007/03/09/good-vista-technet-article/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just finished reading Inside the Windows Vista Kernel: Part 2. While this is very technical, I suggest that anyone who works heavily with VISTA have a read. There were a lot of &#8216;oh, that&#8217;s why&#8217; moments through this article. Have a great weekend ;-)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just finished reading <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/technetmag/issues/2007/03/VistaKernel/">Inside the Windows Vista Kernel: Part 2</a>. While this is very technical, I suggest that anyone who works heavily with VISTA have a read. There were a lot of &#8216;oh, that&#8217;s why&#8217; moments through this article.</p>
<p>Have a great weekend ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brendon.davis.to/2007/03/09/good-vista-technet-article/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Bitlocker on VISTA doesn&#8217;t do</title>
		<link>http://brendon.davis.to/2007/02/06/vista-bitlocker/</link>
		<comments>http://brendon.davis.to/2007/02/06/vista-bitlocker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 04:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brendon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TechStuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VISTA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brendon.davis.to/2007/02/06/vista-bitlocker-use/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After reading an article on TheRegister I think some people have misunderstood the purpose for BitLocker. It is a &#8216;full drive encryption&#8217; product. In most cases, the keys are stored on the hardware or on a removable USB drive. Assuming your laptop with Bitlocker is stolen, the person can still turn the computer on and boot [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading an article on <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/02/02/computer_forensics_vista/">TheRegister</a> I think some people have misunderstood the purpose for BitLocker. It is a &#8216;full drive encryption&#8217; product. In most cases, the keys are stored on the hardware or on a removable USB drive.</p>
<p>Assuming your laptop with Bitlocker is stolen, the person can still turn the computer on and boot into windows. They can&#8217;t log on because they don&#8217;t know your password, and of course you use a complex password&#8230;. If they take the drive out of the laptop and try to read it on another computer or boot off an external drive in your computer. Your system partition will have an invalid file system, so they can&#8217;t access your data.</p>
<p>If they try to reset your SAM password using a Linux boot utility, it won&#8217;t work because the SAM is encrypted on the drive.</p>
<p>Further to this, BitLocker only works on the SYSTEM partition (not active partition). So any other volume&#8217;s on your PC will need to be encrypted using <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/security/glossary.mspx#encrypting_file_system">EFS</a>. This is still secure because the encryption keys for the EFS files are stored on the system drive and are encrypted therefore unavailable.</p>
<p>BitLocker will NOT stop a person from gaining access to your data if you have weak passwords or they obtain the USB key.<br />
It will NOT stop a forensic analysis from taking a copy of the encrypted drive.</p>
<p>It WILL stop someone copying your documents/ emails/ etc. off your stolen device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brendon.davis.to/2007/02/06/vista-bitlocker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weekly configurations for MCE Guide download are a hassle</title>
		<link>http://brendon.davis.to/2007/02/05/weekly_epg_config/</link>
		<comments>http://brendon.davis.to/2007/02/05/weekly_epg_config/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 01:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brendon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MediaCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechStuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VISTA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brendon.davis.to/2007/02/05/weekly_epg_config/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have noticed on my VISTA MCE at home that I need to reconfigure the guide details every week. After the third week of my EPG not updating I did some research. I found this link from mediacenter.com.au which fixed half the problem; and this link from mediacenter.com.au explains how to fix the other half. Basically, Microsoft in their infinite wisdom [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have noticed on my VISTA <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/mediacenter/default.mspx">MCE</a> at home that I need to reconfigure the guide details every week. After the third week of my <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=define%3Aepg&amp;rls=com.microsoft:en-au&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;startIndex=&amp;startPage=1">EPG</a> not updating I did some research. I found this link from <a href="http://www.xpmediacentre.com.au/community/downloads.php?do=file&amp;id=126">mediacenter.com.au</a> which fixed half the problem; and this link from <a href="http://www.xpmediacentre.com.au/community/vista-media-center-software/14573-ice-guide-fix-vista-rc2-7.html">mediacenter.com.au</a> explains how to fix the other half.</p>
<p>Basically, Microsoft in their infinite wisdom setup their EPG settings so that each time Windows Update runs it checks the value of the registry key and will reset it to the default. This way if Microsoft decide to change their epg update URL, they can. Only problem is that it breaks all the other EPG programs.</p>
<p>It has now been 2 weeks with no EPG download problems. Read on for a step by step guide to how I fixed it.<span id="more-147"></span></p>
<ol>
<li>Install KeepKey into the C:\ProgramData\KeepKey folder</li>
<li>Install the KeepKey service by running %windir%\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\installutil /i C:\keepKey\keepKey.exe</li>
<li>Stop Keepkey Service</li>
<li>Run Media Center channel &amp; guide detection. STOP before putting in the post code.</li>
<li>Alt+Tab to install your EPG (<a href="http://www.epgstream.net/">FreeEPG</a> or <a href="http://www.icetv.com.au">IceTV</a>) Next -&gt; Next -&gt; Finish.</li>
<li>Alt+Tab back to your MCE, enter the post code and finish the detection.</li>
<li>Assign the names to the channels.</li>
<li>Alt+Tab again to CMD and start the KeepKey Service </li>
</ol>
<p>9.   Go out for a beer knowing that your precious CSI, CSI NY &amp; Two and a Half Men episodes are being recorded for you to watch later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brendon.davis.to/2007/02/05/weekly_epg_config/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clean Install with VISTA upgrade</title>
		<link>http://brendon.davis.to/2007/02/05/upgradevista/</link>
		<comments>http://brendon.davis.to/2007/02/05/upgradevista/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 00:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brendon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TechStuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VISTA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brendon.davis.to/2007/02/05/upgradevista/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now I&#8217;m a big fan of doing clean installs when putting a new operating system (and even some service packs) on your computer. Over time your computer builds up a mountain of temp files, logs and other un-necessary information.  A clean install is a good way to remove all of this and generally speed up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I&#8217;m a big fan of doing clean installs when putting a new operating system (and even some service packs) on your computer. Over time your computer builds up a mountain of temp files, logs and other un-necessary information.  A clean install is a good way to remove all of this and generally speed up the responsiveness of your system.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=5932" title="Clean Install Workaround for Vista Update">DailyTech</a> is running an article on how to perform a clean install when using the VISTA upgrade DVD. With the cost of Vista I see most families will need to buy upgrade licences just so that they can afford the software. I don&#8217;t however envy the poor uncle/ cousin/ family friend that have to help with a re-install of VISTA 12 months down the track. Images of my own experiences looking for that old copy of windows 3.11 Setup Disk 1 or Windows 95 CD still haunt me to this day.</p>
<p>While the method proposed by DailyTech is a bit &#8216;fiddley&#8217; it will definitely be easier and more stable than doing an upgrade from XP. The other benefit is that once your VISTA upgrade key is activated you don&#8217;t need to go searching for your old CD keys again. :-)</p>
<p>The basic steps for doing the clean install are:<span id="more-149"></span></p>
<ol>
<li>Boot of the Vista DVD and do a trial install by not entering the DVD key</li>
<li>Select the version of Vista you are licensed for and install the trial copy</li>
<li>Once the install is complete and windows has booted, run the setup from windows and run an upgrade. This time enter the upgrade DVD key.</li>
<li>Allow Vista to install over your trail version</li>
<li>Once the upgrade is complete delete the \windows.old\ folder.</li>
</ol>
<p>Now I assume you need to upgrade from your current XP install once to begin with so that your key is activated and your XP key is invalidated.</p>
<p>Thanks again to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailytech.com/">DailyTech</a> for the instructions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brendon.davis.to/2007/02/05/upgradevista/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This guy must own a Bot-Net</title>
		<link>http://brendon.davis.to/2007/01/11/this-guy-must-own-a-bot-net/</link>
		<comments>http://brendon.davis.to/2007/01/11/this-guy-must-own-a-bot-net/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brendon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TechStuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VISTA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brendon.davis.to/2007/01/11/this-guy-must-own-a-bot-net/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alex St. John in his infinite wisdom has proclaimed that Windows Vista will see the Windows online gaming market end in an apocalyptic end. Citing Microsoft&#8217;s Evil UAC &#038; the new Game Explorer as the main culprit in an article &#8220;Vista Casts A Pall On PC Gaming&#8220;. Alex, if you ever end up reading this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex St. John in his infinite wisdom has proclaimed that Windows Vista will see the Windows online gaming market end in an apocalyptic end. Citing Microsoft&#8217;s Evil UAC &#038; the new Game Explorer as the main culprit in an article &#8220;<a href="http://www.gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=12314" target="_blank">Vista Casts A Pall On PC Gaming</a>&#8220;.</p>
<p>Alex, if you ever end up reading this I suggest that you actually use a copy of VISTA before posting any more propaganda about it. For years software developers have been lazy; writing programs that create errors when they are not run as an Administrator. I suggest you being one of them, have a good look at <a title="Utilites for Windows" href="http://www.microsoft.com/sysinternals">SysInternals</a>, they provide a large number of free tools that let you view access to windows and debug why your applications do not work properly.</p>
<p><span id="more-136"></span>By default, Parental controls are not turned on so I don&#8217;t see why you should complain about this stopping most users from running your games. UAC is turned on but can be easily turned off with a single tick box &#038; reboot. A better idea would be for you to put the &#8216;<a title="Teach your apps to play nice with VISTA" href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/07/01/UAC/default.aspx">My application is crap and needs to run as an adminstrator</a>&#8216; flag in all your games and windows will automatically ask once for approval to run the program, and then the only problems will be the ones with your coding. And while we are on that topic, if you write your web sites properly and digitally sign your code, IE will happily download the files without error messages and warnings.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a parent (yet) but when I am, I will definitely want to know what my kids are doing with their computer. There is so much Pornography, Spy ware, Viruses, Paedophiles out on the internet, I like the idea of having to approve the programs my children run. They ask, I check and approve. It&#8217;s a great idea.</p>
<p>The only people I can see that will have a problem with the new systems implemented will be those ones that run Bot-Nets, Ad-ware &#038; Spy ware networks. Of course, if this was your real aim and the &#8216;Games&#8217; are just a front your comments make perfect sense.</p>
<p>The days of all users running with administrator privileges are gone. I wish you the all the best in learning how to code in this every changing world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brendon.davis.to/2007/01/11/this-guy-must-own-a-bot-net/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UAC &#8211; Even Administrators are now users</title>
		<link>http://brendon.davis.to/2006/12/27/uac/</link>
		<comments>http://brendon.davis.to/2006/12/27/uac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 03:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brendon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TechStuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VISTA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brendon.davis.to/2006/12/27/uac/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[User-Access Control is one of VISTA&#8217;s really useful new features. It may cause problems with a number of badly written applications that are not UAC aware but the advantages definitely outweigh the drawbacks. With UAC enabled, whenever a user (or program) wishes to change or access something deemed to be &#8220;system critical&#8221; the screen will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>User-Access Control is one of VISTA&#8217;s really useful new features. It may cause problems with a number of badly written applications that are not UAC aware but the advantages definitely outweigh the drawbacks.</p>
<p>With UAC enabled, whenever a user (or program) wishes to change or access something deemed to be &#8220;system critical&#8221; the screen will dull and a prompt will open above the requesting process asking if the user requested the change. This is a GUI version of the process used in Linux &#038; Unix where to administer something, the user must type SU to elevate their privileges.</p>
<p><span id="more-88"></span><br />
 <br />
Most settings in Vista that require the UAC approval display the Microsoft Security Shield as part of the icon or text. This way you know to expect the prompt.</p>
<p>You may find some games will not run properly unless they are run with an administrative account. In this case, you can configure in the properties of the shortcut/ executable to always run as an administrator OR you can right click the application and select &#8216;Run as Administrator&#8217;. Most post-UAC created applications will either not need to run as an administrator or should display the Shield as part of the application icon.</p>
<p>My only word of advice is when you first build a Vista PC or if you are changing a lot of configurations, turn off UAC (it&#8217;s under User Accounts in Control Panel), install your programs, configure your settings and then turn it back on again. Otherwise you will likely get so fed up with the prompts that you turn the setting off and leave it that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brendon.davis.to/2006/12/27/uac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BitLocker &#8211; Full (SYSTEM) Drive Encryption</title>
		<link>http://brendon.davis.to/2006/11/13/bitlocker/</link>
		<comments>http://brendon.davis.to/2006/11/13/bitlocker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 05:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brendon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TechStuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VISTA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brendon.davis.to/2006/11/13/bitlocker/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BitLocker is another of Windows Vista&#8217;s new features (in Business Editions only). This supports the ability to encrypt all data on the SYSTEM partition; not to be confused with the ACTIVE &#8211; BOOT partition. A separate un-encrypted boot partition of 30MB (1.5GB recommended) is required for the boot files.  The system is very manageable via [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BitLocker is another of Windows Vista&#8217;s new features (in Business Editions only). This supports the ability to encrypt all data on the SYSTEM partition; not to be confused with the ACTIVE &#8211; BOOT partition. A separate un-encrypted boot partition of 30MB (1.5GB recommended) is required for the boot files.  The system is very manageable via group policy and for users who do not have a TPM chip, group policy must be used to bypass the TPM check. I like this for two reasons,</p>
<p><span id="more-78"></span></p>
<ul>
<li>(Dumb) Users with old/ cheep hardware cannot enable encryption using the BitLocker console therefore not loose any data.</li>
<li>Network Admins can use the local group policy settings to bypass the TPM check because of course they would keep a copy of the decryption key in a safe location.</li>
</ul>
<p>Be warned, I have found that the BIOS for some older devices do not support prompting for a USB flash drive during boot. As such my wonderful Toshiba Tecra S1 does not support BitLocker. My newer ASUS M/B does and works quite well. Computer boots, select Windows Vista, Prompts for</p>
<p>USB Drive<br />
, insert drive, Vista tells you to remove the drive and it continues booting. Most important thing then is NEVER STORE THE USB DRIVE WITH THE COMPTUER.</p>
<p>Requirements for BitLocker are: </p>
<ul>
<li>A TPM Module</li>
<li>Small Active partition, I recommend 50MB set as S:\</li>
<li>Large System partition, 16GB Min for Vista</li>
<li>USB Thumb drive (optional but I recommend this for power users)</li>
<li>Pin code (optional, recommended for normal users)</li>
</ul>
<p>Windows Vista creates a recovery key(string)/ file when drive is initial encrypted which using group policy can be stored on a network location. The other good feature is that a drive can be encrypted but set NOT to prompt for encryption keys. So if a user needs to drop their laptop to a support department, they can de-activate BitLocker without un-encrypting the drive. Failing this, the tech can type in the insanely long recovery key that was backed up with Group Policy. </p>
<p>Overall, BitLocker is a great thing for safety of data, just don&#8217;t implement USB drives or pin numbers on shared devices or else the drive and key will end up attached to the lid of the laptop&#8230;. :-S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brendon.davis.to/2006/11/13/bitlocker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

